That
is the same situation that had occured at the bridge. The first time I went, I
got very close, got film, and that inspired me to spend another year in the
area studying not only the large objects flying around the sky but the small
objects on the ground. In the end I spent the better part of two years in the
area trying to see the object and talking to people in and around Carman
Manitoba who had UFO sightings.
After
the first event with the ground light at the bridge I was out the very next
night trying to get close for a good photograph, or to jump on it which I had
not been able to do the night before.
My
friend who 20 years later would be very sceptical when I met him at the library
was also out on the second night. He was with a friend, and I recall them
racing down the various mile roads in the area, without their lights on,
chasing the ground lights that were still visible in the area.
I
believe that the ground lights may still have been orange the second night, but
I am pretty sure after that they changed to a wait light that closely resembled
a car coming down the road. We were able to distinguish which was a car and
which was a ground light by viewing the object with binoculars.
In
the binoculars a car could be easily spotted as it's lights could be seen
clearly giving off beams of light they were directed down the road. When orbs
or ground lights were seen in binoculars, the telltale beams of light were not
present. After I first noticed this, I began to describe the ground lights as
deadlights. They could be very intensely bright, but they did not give us much
light to illuminate the area around it. It resembled modern day LED lights
which did not exist at the time.
I
had noticed this about the ground light that was on the bridge the night
before. I could clearly recall that it was along the wooden railings on the
side of the bridge. It was no more than two inches from the railings, but even
though it was very intense light, there was just a faint orange glow on the
bridge railing. I recall thinking why was the very bright light not lighting up
the entire countryside.
Night
after night I would go out to try to solve the ground light mystery. We tried
to use infrared film to get a better idea of what we were looking at, but that
failed because nobody knew how to read the infrared film and what it meant.
We tried to get around the object in coming in
from the backside, but that did not work. we tried driving down the road slowly
to push the object farther down the road. I would quickly jump out of the car
and hide in the ditch. The car would continue to push the object down the road
and the idea was to win the car came back and crossed where I was the light at
the end of the road would follow it and it would come right across on the road
from where I was lying in the ditch. We tried this a couple of times but it
didn't work. I would get back in the car and as we drove away the light would
now follow us.
Eventually,
we gave up and resorted to the only thing that worked. We would flash a light
at the Two objects that were at the end of the road. One would be a little bit
brighter than the other. We would then flash a flashlight directly at the
brighter of the two, and it would flare up. The second object would stay dimly
lit just on the side of the road beside the bright flaring object.
As
the object flared we would take photographs. That was all we could really do. Various
people would have ideas especially when it came to cameras and lenses. One
night a gentleman brought a 2500 millimeter telephoto lens set up on a tripod
to get a close up look at the light. That failed because the lens was able to
pick up the heat coming off the road and this caused a very WAVY photograph in
which really nothing was visible.
The
amount we were able to film was limited in the 1970s. We did not have any
financing from anybody to do the investigation so we were forced to pay for gas
back and forth every night. More importantly of photography at that time was 35
millimeter which meant we could only shoot 24 or 48 photographs at night, and
that would have to be processed and paid for out of our own pockets.
On
one occasion I got tremendously good photographs of larger objects flying
around in the sky. They were so good did I instructed the film processor's to
not cut the negative. I wanted a record of which photograph was taken after
which photograph. Mistakenly I said that it did not want any photographs done
from the negative. As had happened a few times before, I figured I had the
evidence they would be accepted by everybody as definitive.
When
did filmstrip came back to me I viewed the images by holding them up to the
light. They looked as good as I had imagined they would turn out. I put them in
the canister and sent them to Wendell Stevens to analyze and to verify how good
these photographs had been. They never arrived. People would immediately
imagine a government conspiracy, but I never saw it that way. I immediately
knew that I had gone cheap on the packaging. I had used just a normal envelope
and had not packaged it as a package which I should have done. This was one of
the big regrets I had in the research I did for the two years that I was there.
As
word spread many people would approach me and ask whether they could come and
view what we were seeing. Over the year that I studied the ground lights I must
have taken three or four dozen people to the one site where the ground light was
the most active.
During
the one year I also discovered that there were other areas where these objects
would sit on the road. These ground lights however, we're not as active and
they appeared to be farther down the road.
Every
time I took people out for the first time, we would go through the 1st half
hour convincing the person that the object they were looking at was not a car
or a farm like. Each person, when they first saw it, would state that it looked
like a car coming down the road.
I
would say, “how long do you think it will take for the car to get to us?”
They
would reply, “5 minutes.”
At
the end of five minutes, I would say to them, “do you still think it's a car?”
They
would reply, “no, but maybe it's a farm light down the road.”
We
would then demonstrate to the new person that it was not a farm right down the
road. That would lead to them wanting to go down a side road and come in from
behind it. I would tell him that we had tried this before and it doesn't work
but they would continue to insist until we showed them that this wouldn't work
as well.
This
constant skepticism was very wearing on the system. Eventually, when new people
would want to have me take them out, I would draw them a map as to where to go
and tell them to have a good time.
Comments
Post a Comment